Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Rideout

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 22, 2002No. 26656-3-IIPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, C.J.

— Sara Rideout did not deliver her daughter, Caroline, to court-ordered visitation with her father, Christopher Rideout. Sara explained to Christopher that Caroline refused to go. On Christopher’s motion, the court commissioner found Sara in contempt, awarded Christopher costs and attorney fees, and imposed a fine. The commissioner found that Sara acted in bad faith by not delivering Caroline to her father. Sara moved to revise the commissioner’s order, but the superior court upheld the order. Sara appeals and Christopher cross-appeals to argue that the commissioner awarded him insufficient…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Smith v. Skagit CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  2. In Re the Marriage of CrosettoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
  3. Marriage of Clark v. AtkinsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Jannot v. JannotCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  5. State v. PestaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of RideoutWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  2. In Re Marriage of RideoutWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  3. In re the Marriage of BurrillCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  4. Ames v. AmesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
  5. In re the Marriage of EklundCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API