Legal Opinion

Westfall v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 10, 1990No. 3-89-167-CRPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

A jury found appellant guilty of intentional or knowing injury to a child. Tex. Pen.Code Ann. § 22.04 (1989). The district court assessed punishment at imprisonment for thirty years.

In his only point of error, appellant contends the district court erred by overruling his objection to the jury charge. Those portions of the charge relevant to this ground of error are as follows:

I

A person commits the offense of Serious Bodily Injury To A Child if he intentionally or knowingly engages in conduct that causes serious bodily injury to a child who is fourteen (14) years of age or younger.

[[Image…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. Alvarado v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  3. Beggs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  4. Kelly v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  5. Phillips v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Banks v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1991
  2. Morales v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  3. Navarro v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
  4. Skidmore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
  5. Daniel Navarro v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API