Legal Opinion

Haag v. Haag

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 2016No. 20150193PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Heather Haag appealed from a district court order dénying her motion to modify primary residential responsibility, parenting time, and child support. We reverse and remand, concluding the court’s decision was induced by an erroneous view of the law and the court’s finding that Heather Haag did not prove a material change in circumstances is clearly erroneous.

I.’

[¶ 2] Heather Haag and Michael Haag were married in 2000 and have one minor child together. ■ The parties divorced in 2009, and the district court- adopted the parties’ stipulation and ordered the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Siewert v. SiewertNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Eberle v. EberleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Knutson v. KnutsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Mock v. MockNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Lechler v. LechlerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. O'Hara v. SchneiderNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Valeu v. StrubeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  3. McCay v. McCayNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
  4. Goetz v. GoetzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
  5. Scott v. ScottNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API