Carr v. State
Court of Appeals of Mississippi
1Opinion of the Court
LEE, G.J.,
for the Court:
¶ 1. This appeal arises from the trial, court’s denial of Timothy Lee Carr’s motion for post-conviction relief (PCR). Carr now appeals, arguing the trial court erred: (1) by., allowing the State to amend the indictment without providing him sufficient notice; (2) by failing to have a bifurcated sentencing hearing before sentencing him as a habitual offender; and (3) by .relying on copies of Carr’s two prior felony convictions, which were not introduced into , evidence during sentencing.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶ 2. Carr was convicted of manslaughter in Jones County…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Caspari v. BohlenSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Foster v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
- Beard v. BanksSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Beard v. BanksSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lorenzo Hull v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2015
- Daner Ford v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2016
- Timothy Carr v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2015
- Daner Ford v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2016
- Daner Ford v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.