Legal Opinion

Carr v. State

Court of Appeals of Mississippi

Decided April 29, 2014No. 2013-CP-01013-COAPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEE, G.J.,

for the Court:

¶ 1. This appeal arises from the trial, court’s denial of Timothy Lee Carr’s motion for post-conviction relief (PCR). Carr now appeals, arguing the trial court erred: (1) by., allowing the State to amend the indictment without providing him sufficient notice; (2) by failing to have a bifurcated sentencing hearing before sentencing him as a habitual offender; and (3) by .relying on copies of Carr’s two prior felony convictions, which were not introduced into , evidence during sentencing.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶ 2. Carr was convicted of manslaughter in Jones County…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Caspari v. BohlenSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Foster v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Beard v. BanksSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Beard v. BanksSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lorenzo Hull v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2015
  2. Daner Ford v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Timothy Carr v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Daner Ford v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Daner Ford v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API