Legal Opinion

Beard v. Banks

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 24, 2004No. 02-1603PublishedCited by 354 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thomas

In Mills v. Maryland, 486 U. S. 867 (1988), and McKoy v. North Carolina, 494 U. S. 433 (1990), this Court held invalid capital sentencing schemes that require juries to disregard mitigating factors not found unanimously. In this case, we must determine whether the rule announced , in Mills and McKoy can be applied on federal habeas corpus review to a defendant whose conviction became final in 1987. Under our retroactivity analysis as set forth in Teague v. Lane, 489 U. S. 288 (1989), federal habeas corpus petitioners may not avail themselves of new rules of criminal procedure outside two…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by354 opinions

  1. Montgomery v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  2. Welch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  3. Ramos v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
  4. Jimenez v. QuartermanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Chaidez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013

349 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API