Jessar Manufacturing Corp. v. Berlin
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Bell,
Plaintiff sought and obtained- a decree in equity restraining defendants from manufacturing and selling baby auto seats which had a horse’s head on the front and reins for the child to hold.
Plaintiff is a manufacturer of baby auto seats and other toys. Early in 1954 it brought out and marketed the above-described baby auto seats. Defendants copied this product and marketed it under their own name, which was in no way similar to plaintiff’s name, claiming they had a legal right to do so, since' plaintiff’s invention was not pátehted and had not .acquired, a special…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Hanover Star Milling Co. v. MetcalfSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Kellogg Co. v. National Biscuit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Noonan EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- American Clay Manufacturing Co. v. American Clay Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Van Products Co. v. General Welding & Fabricating Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Woodside v. Sun Ray Drug Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Goldenstern & Cohen, Inc. v. Butler Iron & Steel Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1943
- Dorman Products, Inc. v. Dayco Products, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2010
- Pennsylvania Dutch Co. v. Pennsylvania Amish Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Cumberland County1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.