Legal Opinion

EHRLICHMAN v. SIRICA Et Al.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided August 28, 1975No. A-93PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Chief Justice Burger, Circuit Justice.

This application comes before me as Circuit Justice for a stay of the District Judge’s order setting trial for September 30, 1974, of United States v. Mitchell, D. C. Crim. No. 74-110. Defendant Ehrlichman seeks this stay alleging that past and continuing prejudicial publicity has made it impossible for him to receive a fair trial in this venue at the time now set, and that he will not have sufficient time to prepare his defense.

The trial had been set for September 9, 1974. When both the prosecution and defense asked for more time to prepare for trial…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sheppard v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Frohwerk v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. Goldsby v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. Isaacs v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. HaldemanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
  2. United States v. PartinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  3. United States v. Harry R. Haldeman, United States of America v. John D. Ehrlichman, United States of America v. John N. Mitchell, United States of America v. Harry R. Haldeman and John D. Ehrlichman, Nos. 75-1381, 75-1382, 75-1384 and 76-1441.united States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia CircuitCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
  4. Evans v. SmithDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1999
  5. Gray v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API