Legal Opinion
United States v. Stephens
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided June 11, 1970No. Crim. 70-130PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DAUGHERTY, District Judge.
The Defendants have filed various motions herein which will be disposed of individually below.
1. Motion to Dismiss (filed pro se). Defendants urge dismissal on the ground that the grand jury was not selected, drawn or summoned in accordance with the law. No factual allegations are offered to support this claim, and Defendants assert only that because they have not been able to obtain a list of the grand jury, they cannot ascertain if the grand jury represented a cross section of the community. For two reasons this challenge may not be permitted. 28 U.S.C.A. §…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. BramblettSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Charles McGill v. United States of America, Walter M. Hinton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
- United States v. Robert Artemus Burkeen, United States of America v. Harold Tucker MatlockCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1966
- United States v. M. Raymond AdlerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- Daniel Jackson Oliver Wendel Holmes Morgan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Parker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1976
- United States v. HallDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1975
- United States v. Dennis D'AmAtoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Olin Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1979
- In Re BaldingerDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1973
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.