Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Banahasky

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 6, 1977No. 556PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPAETH, Judge:

Appellant was convicted by a judge sitting without a jury of possession of a small amount of marijuana in violation of the Controlled Substance, Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act. 1 Post-trial motions were denied, and appellant was fined $100.00 and sentenced to a 30 day suspended sentence and probation of six months. Appellant contends here that he should be discharged because the evidence was insufficient to support a conviction, or in the alternative that he should be awarded a new trial because the evidence was obtained in violation of the 4th Amendment. We hold that the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Cox v. Chesapeake & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Commonwealth v. FortuneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Commonwealth v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Commonwealth v. ThompsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Commonwealth v. BagleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Commonwealth v. CardonaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Commonwealth v. GelfontSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API