State v. Longyear Holding Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Per curiam
The assignments of error raise the identical questions presented on the former appeal from an order dénying defendants’ motion for a new trial. State v. Longyear Holding Co. 224 Minn. 451, 29 N. W. (2d) 657. Where an order denying a new trial has been affirmed on appeal, all questions that might have been raised therein are set at rest and cannot be raised on a subsequent appeal from the judgment. School Dist. No. 1 v. Aiton, 175 Minn. 346, 348, 221 N. W. 424, 425; Skog v. Pomush, 221 Minn. 11, 20 N. W. (2d) 530; 1 Dunnell, Dig. & Supp. § 398.
Hence, the decision on the former appeal is…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. Longyear Holding Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- School District No. 1, Itasca County v. AitonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Skog v. PomushSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
3Cited by4 opinions
- Stottlemyer v. KlineCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
- Wurdemann v. HjelmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- State v. AdamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- State v. AdamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957