Legal Opinion

State v. Lowe

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1930No. 5580PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcNAUGHTON, J.

This is a prosecution for forgery. The defendant had for a number of years been employed in the office of the county superintendent of schools ’of Twin Falls county.. Her duties were to keep the records and books and perform any of the duties pertaining to the office of county superintendent. Records of the orders drawn by the v.ariotis school districts were kept by her. When an expenditure of funds was to be made by a common school district; an order for a warrant was issued by the district, signed by the chairman and clerk of the board. This order had to be countersigned by the county…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People v. ArnoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  2. State v. O'NeilIdaho Supreme Court · 1913
  3. State v. CavinessIdaho Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Joyce Bros. v. StanfieldIdaho Supreme Court · 1920
  5. People v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. PolsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1959
  2. State v. EmoryIdaho Supreme Court · 1935
  3. State v. SedamIdaho Supreme Court · 1940
  4. State v. HarriesUtah Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Brazee v. MorrisArizona Supreme Court · 1947

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API