Legal Opinion

State v. Harries

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 19, 1950No. 7273PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LATIMER, Justice.

The defendant, Robert S. Harries, who was Chief of the Enforcement Division of the Utah Liquor Control Commission, was charged by indictment with the crime of receiving a bribe. He was found guilty as charged and appeals from the judgment of conviction. His assignments of error or statement of points will be referred to later.

Section 103 — 26—4, U. C. A. 1943, defines the offense as follows:

“Every executive officer, or person elected or appointed to an executive office, who asks, receives or agrees to receive any bribe, upon any agreement or understanding that his vote,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. SweeneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  2. State v. O'NeilIdaho Supreme Court · 1913
  3. State v. FitchetteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  4. State v. EmoryIdaho Supreme Court · 1935
  5. State v. SpencerUtah Supreme Court · 1897

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. ForsythUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State v. FauxUtah Supreme Court · 1959
  3. KUTV, INC. v. ConderUtah Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State v. SchievingUtah Supreme Court · 1975
  5. KUTV, INC. v. ConderUtah Supreme Court · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API