Legal Opinion

Bristol-Myers Squibb Company v. Clare Connors

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 29, 2020No. 20-15515PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY; No. 20-15515 SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC; SANOFI US SERVICES INC., FKA Sanofi- D.C. No. Aventis US Inc.; SANOFI- 1:20-cv-00010- SYNTHELABO LLC, JAO-RT Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. OPINION CLARE E. CONNORS, in her official capacity as the Attorney General of the State of Hawaii, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii Jill Otake, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted September 14, 2020 San Francisco, California Filed October 29, 2020 Before:…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Hertz Corp. v. FriendSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. Huffman v. Pursue, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Applied Underwriters, Inc. v. Ricardo LaraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
  2. Seattle Pacific University v. Robert FergusonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
  3. Applied Underwriters, Inc. v. LaraDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  4. California Ins. Co. v. LaraDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  5. Calvary Chapel San Jose v. CodyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API