Hamilton v. Smith
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to St. Joseph. Malicious prosecution. Defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.
This writ of error is brought to reverse a judgment for $3500 rendered in Smith’s favor on a charge of malicious prosecution. Some preliminary explanation is requisite. In the summer of 1876 the wife of Hamilton instituted her suit by bill against him for a divorce, and he employed the defendant Dunning, a solicitor, to make defense for him. In due season Dunning put in Hamilton’s answer and it contained a charge of adultery by Mrs. Hamilton with Smith. But shortly before the answer a sworn statement of one Whittenberg *225was obtained to the effect that Smith had recently committed the offense…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Allison v. ChandlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
- Lincoln v. ClaflinSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Wheeler v. NesbittSupreme Court of the United States · 1861
- Scripps v. ReillyMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- Heyne v. . BlairNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Friedman v. DozorcMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
- People v. MacCulloughMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
- Michael v. MatsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
- Antcliff v. JuneMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Filer v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.