Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Smith

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1878PublishedCited by 57 opinions

Error to St. Joseph. Malicious prosecution. Defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.

This writ of error is brought to reverse a judgment for $3500 rendered in Smith’s favor on a charge of malicious prosecution. Some preliminary explanation is requisite. In the summer of 1876 the wife of Hamilton instituted her suit by bill against him for a divorce, and he employed the defendant Dunning, a solicitor, to make defense for him. In due season Dunning put in Hamilton’s answer and it contained a charge of adultery by Mrs. Hamilton with Smith. But shortly before the answer a sworn statement of one Whittenberg *225was obtained to the effect that Smith had recently committed the offense…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Allison v. ChandlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
  2. Lincoln v. ClaflinSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  3. Wheeler v. NesbittSupreme Court of the United States · 1861
  4. Scripps v. ReillyMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Heyne v. . BlairNew York Court of Appeals · 1875

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Friedman v. DozorcMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  2. People v. MacCulloughMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Michael v. MatsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  4. Antcliff v. JuneMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Filer v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1893

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API