Legal Opinion

Barr v. Chicago, St. Louis & Pittsburgh Railroad

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 5, 1894No. 1,300PublishedCited by 11 opinions

From the Henry Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtLotz, C. J.

The appellant, as the administrator of the estate of one George Harlan, deceased, brought this action against the appellee to recover damages on account of the death of said decedent, alleged to have been caused by the willful conduct of the appellee’s servant. The cause was put at issue and tried by a jury, which, at the request of the appellee, returned a special verdict.

*434The court overruled appellant’s motion for judgment on the verdict, and his motion for a new trial; and sustained appellee’s motion for judgment on the verdict, and rendered judgment in favor of the appellee.

The appellant…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Palmer v. Chicago, St. Louis & Pittsburgh RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Gregory v. Cleveland, Columbus, Cincinnati & Indianapolis RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Chicago, St. Louis & Pittsburgh Railroad v. NashIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
  4. Overton v. Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1891

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Wysong v. NealisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
  2. Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. BraffordIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
  3. Southern Railway Co. v. McNeeleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1909
  4. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. CronbachIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
  5. Walker v. WehkingIndiana Court of Appeals · 1902

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API