Legal Opinion

State v. Bustamante

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 23, 1969No. 2 CA-CR 187PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HATHAWAY, Judge.

The appellant and Castillo ■ were charged with first degree burglary and found guilty after trial by_ jury. Bustamante was sentenced to not less than 12 nor more than 15 years imprisonment while Castillo was sentenced to a term of not less than 1 nor more than 5 years. Castillo’s appeal was dismissed on his own motion. Bustamante contends that the trial court erred in admitting evidence allegedly obtained through an illegal search and seizure and also that the sentence was excessive.

During the early morning of September 12; 1968, the apartment of one Paul E. Holmes, located on…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. United States v. RabinowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1950

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. VaughnCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
  2. State v. BrosieCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
  3. State v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  4. State v. MaddasionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
  5. State v. RamosCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API