Legal Opinion

Homan v. Burkhart

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 18, 1930No. Docket No. 6074PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GATES, J., pro tem.

On March 30, 1927, respondent and his wife, who were returning to their home in San Francisco from a business trip and vacation in Texas, stopped in the city of Santa Maria. At about 10 o’clock at night on that date they stored their car, an open club roadster, and certain contents in the car, with appellants, who operate a garage. The baggage consisted of two suitcases, a brown handbag, a black handbag, a hat-box, a trunk and other articles and was in the back part of the automobile. According to the evidence respondent called the attention of the night man who was in…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Perera v. Panama-Pacific International Exp. Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Galowitz v. MagnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
  3. Cussen v. Southern California Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Southern Pacific Co. v. Von Schmidt Dredge Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Pacific Transfer Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1922

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Mozzetti v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Windeler v. Scheers JewelersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. Gardner v. Jonathan ClubCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Romney v. Covey GarageUtah Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Manning v. LambDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API