Shirlene Anderson v. William Forrest Winter, Etc.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CHARLES CLARK, Circuit Judge.
This appeal challenges the constitutionality of the dual retirement system provided for Mississippi state employees. The plaintiffs, present and former agents of the Mississippi Bureau of Narcotics, 1 claim that the state scheme denies them equal protection and substantive due process because they are ineligible for the more liberal retirement and disability benefits provided for officers of the Mississippi Highway Safety Patrol. The district court granted summary judgment for the defendants, 2 and we affirm.
Mississippi has established two separate retirement…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Sonnier v. QuartermanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
- Alford v. City of LubbockCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- O'QUINN v. Chambers County, Tex.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1986
- 27 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1075, 27 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 32,386, 2 Employee Benefits Ca 2249 Truett Alford v. City of Lubbock, Texas and Texas Municipal Retirement SystemCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Dillard v. MusgroveMississippi Supreme Court · 2003
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.