Legal Opinion

Gulf Refining Co. v. Universal Ins.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 6, 1929No. 278PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANTON, Circuit Judge.

A cargo shipped on the vessel Gulf of Venezuela, together with the vessel, sustained a fire loss. The fire was extinguished with foamite and water, but only after considerable damage to both cargo and vessel. The vessel, cargo,- and freight were separately insured by the ap-pellee, who owned both cargo and vessel. The insurance covered fire and marine perils, including general average. Various underwriters, domestic and foreign, participated in the insurance, but the underwriters on the vessel were not the same as those of the freight or cargo. A general average…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Barnard v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
  2. Potter v. Ocean Ins. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1837
  3. Risley v. President & Directors of Ins. Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1910
  4. Sturgis v. CaryU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1855
  5. La Fonciere Compagnie D'Assurances Contre Les Risques De Transport De Toute Nature v. DollarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1910

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Master Shipping Agency, Inc. v. M. S. FaridaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
  2. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc. v. The Tank Steamship Esso CamdenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
  3. Moore-Mccormack Lines, Inc. v. Esso CamdenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
  4. Master Shipping Agency, Inc. v. M. S. Farida, Her Engines, Boilers, Etc. And Norton Line, Third-Party Stockholms Rederi-Aktielbolag Svea, Third-Party v. Court Carpentry & Marine Contractors Co., and International Terminal Operating Co., Third-Party AndCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API