Legal Opinion
City of Montpelier v. Bennett
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided May 1, 1956No. 1835PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.
This is a proceeding in chancery. The pleadings consist of the bill of complaint, the defendants’ answer and cross-bill and the plaintiff’s replication.
The matter involves the rights of the respective parties in and to a piece of land now abutting, on its westerly side, the present three lane highway between the cities of Montpelier and Barre, known as U. S. Route 302, the southerly boundary of the piece in question being the fine between the city of Montpelier and the town of Berlin. The piece extends from that line northerly a distance of approximately 290 feet and it is approximately 3…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- E. A. Strout Realty Agency, Inc. v. WoosterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1953
- Raithel Et Ux. v. HallSupreme Court of Vermont · 1925
- Sparrow v. CimonettiSupreme Court of Vermont · 1948
- Bradley v. . CraneNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
- LaPlante v. EastmanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1954
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- New England Road MacHinery Co. v. CalkinsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1959
- Hoosier Engineering Company v. SheaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1964
- West-Nesbitt, Inc. v. RandallSupreme Court of Vermont · 1967
- In Re Bolduc's PetitionSupreme Court of Vermont · 1958
- Petition of Lyndonville VillageSupreme Court of Vermont · 1959
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.