Legal Opinion

Carrillo v. Valley Bank of Nevada

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1987No. 17394PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Valley Bank of Nevada (Valley Bank or the Bank) sued Carrillo for the balance due on a promissory note. The lower court entered summary judgment in favor of the Bank. For reasons hereafter specified, we reverse.

In February 1981, Carrillo, a joint venturer with Tonopah Enterprises, executed a one-year lease with an option to purchase the OK Corral Inn (the property) in Tonopah. Thereafter, Carrillo obtained a construction loan for approximately $350,000 from Valley Bank. The loan was secured by a trust deed on Carrillo’s leasehold interest in the property, and the loan proceeds were…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bank of Hemet v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  2. First Interstate Bank of Nevada v. ShieldsNevada Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Walter E. Heller Western, Inc. v. BloxhamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. McMillan v. United Mortgage Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Crowell v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceNevada Supreme Court · 1986

4Cited by16 opinions

  1. McDonald v. D.P. Alexander & Las Vegas Boulevard, LLCNevada Supreme Court · 2005
  2. 7912 Limbwood Court Trust v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, D. Nevada · 2013
  3. Adams v. FedAlaska Federal Credit UnionAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC v. Maplewood Springs Homeowners Ass'nDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2017
  5. Murphy v. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API