Legal Opinion

Dodge v. Kings County

California Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1906No. Sac. No. 1258PublishedCited by 2 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.

Appeal by plaintiffs from a judgment and an order denying a motion for new trial.

The action was brought by the appellants, printers and publishers of the Hanford Sentinel, a newspaper, to recover from Kings County the sum of $383.75 for printing and publishing the delinquent tax-list,of the defendant in June, 1901.

The publication was made by direction of the tax-collector. Under the provisions of subdivision 21 of section 25 of the County Government Act ( Stats. 1897, p. 464) the tax-collector had authority to procure such advertising, at a price no greater than that fixed by the board of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Van Harlingen v. DoyleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Journal Publishing Co. v. WhitneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. De Merritt v. WeldonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Santa Barbara County Taxpayers Ass'n v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API