Khan v. Landmark American Insurance
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
McFadden, Judge.
This appeal is from summary judgment rulings by the trial court in a case involving a dispute over insurance coverage arising from a shooting. Because the case was properly transferred from state court to superior court and because the trial court correctly ruled that there exist genuine issues of material fact as to the identity and motive of the shooter, we affirm those rulings. However, because the trial court erred in concluding that damages for the insurer’s breach of the duty to defend its insured in an underlying action are necessarily capped by the policy limit, we…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Colonial Oil Industries v. Underwriters Subscribing to Policy Numbers TO31504670 & TO31504671Supreme Court of Georgia · 1997
- Blackmon v. Tenet Healthsystem Spalding, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2008
- Southern Guaranty Insurance v. DowseSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
- Leader National Insurance v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
- Landmark American Insurance Co. v. KhanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Century Sur. Co. v. AndrewNevada Supreme Court · 2018
- Andrew ex rel. Pretner v. Century Surety Co.District Court, D. Nevada · 2015
- Langdale Co. v. National Union Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2014
- Arlitz v. GEICO Casualty CompanyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2022
- CENTURY SURETY CO. VS. ANDREW (NRAP 5)Nevada Supreme Court · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.