Legal Opinion

Bredeson v. Mackey

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 2014No. 20130254PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McEVERS, Justice.

[¶ 1] Kyle Mackey appeals from a district court order denying his motion to modify parenting time and petition for non-parental visitation. We conclude the district court did not err in finding that Kyle Mackey failed to establish a material change in circumstances justifying a modification of Kyle Mackey’s parenting time. We also conclude the district court did not err in finding that exceptional circumstances did not exist justifying non-parental visitation for Amber Mackey. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] Kyle Mackey and Lindsey Brede-son have one minor child together, O.B., born in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Siewert v. SiewertNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Simburger v. SimburgerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  3. DUFNER v. TrottierNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Hamers v. GuttormsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  5. McAllister v. McAllisterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Curtiss v. CurtissNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Green v. SwiersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Estate of Vaage v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Taylor v. TaylorNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
  5. Stoddard v. SingerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API