Legal Opinion

Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corp. v. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 28, 1966No. Civ. A. No. 9153PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*2OPINION

FOLLMER, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on motion of defendant to stay the above-captioned action and all proceedings therein until an arbitration shall be held in accordance with the terms of the contract entered into between plaintiff and defendant.

As grounds for the motion, defendant alleges that:

1. On August 6, 1962, plaintiff contracted with defendant for the construction of Allegheny Tunnel No. 2 on the Pennsylvania Turnpike in Allegheny and Stony Creek Townships, Somerset County, Pennsylvania, which contract was designated “Contract 145-1”.

2. Sections 1.9.9 and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Flippin Materials Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  2. United States v. F. C. HathawayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
  3. Hunt & Willett, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
  4. Petition of Dover Steamship CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1956
  5. American Elastics, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Local 145, International Ladies Garment Workers' Union v. Fashion Associates, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1984
  2. Abramovich v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County1978
  3. Fawcett v. The Standard Fire Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API