Legal Opinion
Hunt & Willett, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided December 11, 1964No. 376-58PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDavis, Judge
Standing squarely on the record made before the Claims and Appeals Board of the Corps of Engineers (except as to the amount of recovery), the plaintiff-contractor; insists that it is entitled to equitable adjustments under the Changed Conditions and Changes articles , of its contract, as well as remission of liquidated damages assessed against it for unexcused delay in completion. The contract, made in 1951-1952 with the Corps of Engineers after open bidding, was for construction, of the intake structure and outlet diversion at the Lucky Peak Dam, near Boise, Idaho. The price was $396,610,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. Carlo Bianchi & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- WPC Enterprises, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- Flippin Materials Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- National Presto Industries, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Autogiro Company of America v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- United Contractors, a Co-Partnership Consisting of James E. Ward, Elkin Morris and Andrew J. Dickies v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
- Youngdale & Sons Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
- J. A. Jones Construction Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
- Cook v. Oklahoma Board of Public AffairsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.