Leonard v. Pierce County
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtBridgewater, J.
The city of Lakewood appeals summary judgment in favor of D.L. and Bernadine Leonard. The Leonards sued to quiet title to the portion of Beach Lane that abuts their property, arguing that the nonuser statute, RCW 36.87.090, had vacated the road as a matter of law. Beach Lane was dedicated by plat in 1908. We hold that the nonuser statute does not apply because, by the terms of the statute, it will not vacate an unopened road that was dedicated in a plat filed after 1904. The Leonards’ theory that Beach Lane was a federal public road by common law dedication prior to statehood for the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- Young v. Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
- Seven Gables Corp. v. MGM/UA Entertainment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
- Green v. A.P.C.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
- Gillis v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1953
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bryan Kelley And Dorre Don Llc v. Beverly L. TondaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
- Leonard v. Pierce CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003