Legal Opinion

Jennison v. Jennison

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 9, 1985No. 00071PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECK, Judge:

This is an action in equity for specific performance of a stock purchase agreement. The Chancellor ruled that the contract could not be specifically enforced because the parties had not agreed on the price of the stock and the court could not supply the missing term. We affirm.

Plaintiff-appellant is the president and chief executive officer of South Pitt Tool Co., Inc. (“South Pitt”), a closely held corporation in Allegheny County. Defendant-appellee is the founder of the company who has essentially been retired since 1976. Appellant initially went to work for South Pitt in the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Atlantic Richfield Co. v. RazumicSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Field v. Golden Triangle Broadcasting, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Zamore v. WhittenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  4. Blasingame v. American Materials, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Friestad v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Nursing Home Consultants, Inc. v. Quantum Health Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1996
  2. Wakefield v. CrawleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Olson v. North American Industrial Supply, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Allen v. CoatesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  5. Century 21 Heritage Realty, Inc. v. BairSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API