Legal Opinion

International Harvester Co. v. Industrial Commission

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1951No. 31698PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Crampton

Claimant, Dennis Ballard, filed a claim for compensation against the Wisconsin Steel Works of the International Harvester Company, his employer. The arbitrator entered an award, which was sustained by the Industrial Commission, and confirmed by the superior court of Cook County. We granted a writ of error.

The sole question in the case is whether the claimant filed his claim in apt time in compliance with the jurisdictional requirements of the act. Ill. Rev. Stat. 1949, chap. 48, par. 161.

Claimant, 54 years of age, had been employed by the Wisconsin Steel Works as a coal scooper for three and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Inland Rubber Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Burke v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Ervin v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1936
  4. City of Rochelle v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Lewis v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1934

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hathaway v. New Mexico State PoliceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Rodriguez v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Railway Express Agency v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Union Carbide Corp., Food Products Division v. CannonTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
  5. City of Chicago v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API