Legal Opinion

Inland Rubber Co. v. Industrial Commission

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1923No. 15314PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thompson

Plaintiff in error, Earl R. Hummel, while in the employ of the Inland Rubber Company as a finisher of automobile tires, claims to have received an injury which finally totally incapacitated him for work. He was employed by the company in January, 1919, and continued in the employment until he was discharged, in November, 1920. He earned about $50 a week. He testified that he was in good health when he entered the company’s employment; that he had a slight accident in April, 1919; that he did not consider it serious and did not claim compensation at that time; that thereafter he occasionally…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stromberg Motor Device Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Keller v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Ideal Fuel Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Camp Spring Mill Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Chicago Daily News Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Schrabauer v. Schneider Engraving Product, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Chmielewska v. Butte & Superior Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1927
  3. City of Rochelle v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1928
  4. American Car & Foundry Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Brodek v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1937

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API