Legal Opinion

Hagerty v. Lee

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 15, 1892PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Ou error to the Supreme Court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Van Syckel, J.

Hagerty, the plaintiff in error, being ■the owner in fee of a tract of land in the town of Phillips-burg, fronting fifty feet on Main street and having a depth of ■two hundred and twenty feet, conveyed part thereof (twenty-five feet front by two hundred and twenty feet deep) to one ■'Christopher S. •’Winter in fee by deed dated July 10th, 1884.

This deed contained the following reservation : “ The party • of the first part reserving the right to the free use of light and ;air over said tract above described, and in case he should build on…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. Eastern RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879
  2. Chappell v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1892
  3. Inhabitants of Winthrop v. FairbanksSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1856
  4. Randall v. LathamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1869
  5. Randall v. RandallSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1871

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States Pipe Line Co. v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1898
  2. Barkhausen v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Haymaker v. Windsor Reservoir & Canal Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1927
  4. Allison v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Stansell v. American Radiator Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1910

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API