Legal Opinion

Johnson Irrigation Co. v. Ivory

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided September 12, 1933No. 1784PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kimball, Chief Justice.

The plaintiff, an irrigation company, is the grantee of the United States under sections 18 to '21 of the act of congress of March 3, 1891 (26 Stat. 1101, 43 USCA §§ 946-949) of a right of way for its reservoir and canal for irrigation purposes. Lands which are largely covered by plaintiff’s reservoir on its right of way have been granted to defendants by homestead patents subject to the right of way.

Plaintiff claims the right of exclusive possession of its right of way, and brought this action to quiet its title and enjoin defendants from entering upon or occupying any…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. McConnaughySupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Mitchell v. SmaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. New Mexico v. United States Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  4. Kern River Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. Peck v. ConwayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Williams v. WattWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  2. United States v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
  3. United States v. Union Pacific RailroadDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 1954
  4. Jourdan v. Abbott Construction CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Cupps v. Pioneer Canal-LakeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API