Legal Opinion
Bonano v. Southside United Housing Development Corp.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided April 5, 2005No. 1:03-cv-05040PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
GLASSER, District Judge.
This is an age discrimination action brought by plaintiff, Ana D. Bonano (“Bo-nano” or plaintiff), against her former employer, Southside United Housing Development Fund Corporation (“Southside”), and individual defendants David Pagan (“Pagan”) and Jesus Viera (“Viera”). Pending before the Court is plaintiffs motion to amend her complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a). For the following reasons, plaintiffs motion is granted.
FACTS
The following facts taken from plaintiffs complaint are accepted as true for purposes of this motion.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- James Leuer, Jr. and Landon Grainy v. Starpoint Central School District et al.District Court, W.D. New York · 2026
- Williams v. The City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2023
- Williams v. The Russo's Payroll Group, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2023