Legal Opinion
United States v. Saeteurn
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 15, 2007No. 06-10401PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BEA, Circuit Judge:
This case deals with sentencing practice. Specifically, is the sentencing judge required to resolve disputes regarding facts recited in the Presentence Investigation Report (“PSR”), 1 when those facts do not affect the term of imprisonment imposed, but may affect how the sentence is served, including a possible early release from prison? We hold that there is no such requirement upon the sentencing judge. We also consider whether the sentencing judge imposed a reasonable sentence in this case. We conclude that he did.
I
Kae Chai Saeteurn was indicted on several narcotics…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lopez v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- United States v. CantrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Fiore v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Michael J. Conlon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- United States v. StoterauCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Republic of Ecuador v. Douglas MacKayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. James FryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. GreenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. ClantonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.