Legal Opinion
Estate of Haag v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided March 14, 2002No. Civ. 01-1725(DSD/JMM)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DOTY, District Judge.
The above-entitled matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge John M. Mason dated February 21, 2002. No objections have been filed to that Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted.
Based upon the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and all of the files, records and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion to Remand [Docket No. 17] is granted. This matter may be, and hereby is, remanded to the Minnesota District Court, First Judicial District.
LET JUDGMENT BE…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Union Labor Life Insurance v. PirenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States Department of Treasury v. FabeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Howell v. Lab One, Inc.District Court, D. Nebraska · 2002