Legal Opinion

Morrow v. Henneford

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 6, 1935No. 25779. En BancPublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Geraghty, J. —

This action was brought by the plaintiff, who conducts a restaurant business in the city of Seattle, to enjoin the members of the state tax commission from enforcing, as against him and others similarly situated, the provisions of title III, chapter 180, Laws of 1935, p. 721 [Rem. 1935 Sup., § 8370-16 et seq.], levying a sales tax. After trial to the court, judgment was entered dismissing* the plaintiff’s action, and this appeal followed.

The appellant challenges the constitutionality of title III upon several grounds, and also charges that the members of the tax commission are,…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Flint v. Stone Tracy Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Doyle v. Mitchell Brothers Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  4. Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
  5. McCray v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. Gruen v. State Tax CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Covell v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Gaulden v. KirkSupreme Court of Florida · 1950
  4. Roth Drug, Inc. v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  5. Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. WalshSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API