Legal Opinion

Littlejohn v. United States

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided November 11, 1902No. Nos. 3,201, 3,196PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TOWNSEND, District Judge.

Upon sundry importations of sago flour, duty was assessed under the provisions of paragraph 285 of the tariff act of 1897 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1653], for “starch, in-*484eluding all preparations from whatever substance produced, fit for use as starch.” The importers protested, claiming that the article was either free under various paragraphs of the act, the only one necessary now to be considered being the claim that it was free of duty as “sago, crude,” under paragraph 652 of said Act [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1687], or was dutiable only at one-fourth cent per…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Chew Hing Lung v. WiseSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. In re TownsendCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1893

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hampton v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  2. O'Connor-Harrison v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  3. Merck & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API