Legal Opinion
Eggert v. Ford
Washington Supreme Court
Decided July 18, 1944No. 29193PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.
The appellants, as relators, applied to the superior court of Pierce county for a writ of mandamus to compel the county auditor to record a written instrument showing their interest in certain Pierce county lands. A general demurrer was sustained. The relators refused to plead further, and the cause was dismissed. The demurrer admitted allegations briefly summarized in the following paragraph:
On November 17, 1916, Jerry P. Eggert executed an instrument denominated “Declaration of Trust,” declaring that he had taken title to certain Pierce county lands therein described for convenience only,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Waskey v. ChambersSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Edwards v. ThomSupreme Court of Florida · 1889
- People Ex Rel. Oaklawn Corp. v. . DoneganNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- People ex rel. Consumers' Brewing Co. v. FrommeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
- People ex rel. Consumers' Brewing Co. v. FrommeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Fischnaller v. Thurston CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
- In re BetchanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Washington · 2015
- Genesee, Inc. v. Firstline Investment, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1987
- Ago, Washington Attorney General Reports1996
- Alex May v. Spokane CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.