Boyd v. State

In this appeal from his convictions for aggravated assault with a firearm and aggravated stalking, appellant claims that the court should have conducted a Faret-ta 1 inquiry when he insisted that his attorney not waive his speedy trial rights. Because appellant did not assert a right of self-representation, the trial court was not required to determine whether he knowingly rejected the right to counsel. We also affirm the remaining issues raised as to his convictions, but reverse the order of restitution because it was entered without the court holding a hearing.

Prior to the start of trial,…