Legal Opinion

Brooks v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 25, 2000No. SC92011PublishedCited by 167 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

762 So.2d 879 (2000)

Fred Lorenzo BROOKS, Appellant,

v.

STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. SC92011.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 25, 2000.

Rehearing Denied July 26, 2000.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Nada M. Carey, Assistant Public Defender, Second Judicial Circuit, Tallahassee, Florida, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Scott A. Browne, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, Florida, for Appellee.

2Per curiam

We have on appeal the judgment and sentence of the trial court adjudicating Fred Lorenzo Brooks guilty of first-degree murder and imposing the death penalty.[1] We have…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Harding; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Wells; Concurrence.

3Cases cited95 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. State v. DixonSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
  3. Spencer v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  4. Tison v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Urbin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1998

90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by167 opinions

  1. Timothy Lee Hurst v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2016
  2. Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  3. F.B. v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
  4. Spencer v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
  5. Card v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2001

162 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API