Legal Opinion

M. P. Moller, Inc. v. Farley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 15, 1927PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment modified by inserting a provision granting permission nunc pro tunc to bring the action against the receiver, and by providing that the recovery of either damages and costs, or damages, interest and costs, shall run against only the defendants Parley, as receiver, and The Parash Theatre Co., Inc., and as so modified unanimously affirmed, without costs. Present — Cochrane, P. J., Van Kirk, Hinman, McCann and Davis, JJ.; Davis, J., concurs for modification and affirmance but does not regard it necessary to enter a nunc pro tunc order granting leave to sue the receiver, he having…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hackley v. . DraperNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  2. Pruyn v. McCrearyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  3. Hubbell & Curran v. DanaNew York Supreme Court · 1853
  4. Pruyn v. . McCrearyNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
  5. In re YoungDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1881

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Copeland v. SalomonNew York Court of Appeals · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API