Legal Opinion

Hubbell & Curran v. Dana

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1853PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bacon, Justice.

The history of this case, and an extended narrative of the merits of the controversy, are very unnecessarily spread out in the affidavits on which this motion is resisted. There is but a single question involved, to wit, whether the plaintiffs had a right to commence the suit without first asking leave of the court, the defendant being a receiver and prosecuted as such. It was undoubtedly a rule of the old court of chancery of this state, that its officers (including receivers) should not be harassed by suits brought against them at law, involving title to any property held by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Taylor v. BenhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1847
  2. Noe v. GibsonNew York Court of Chancery · 1839
  3. Pixley v. WinchellNew York Supreme Court · 1827

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Baker v. Denver Tramway Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1922
  2. Mulcahey v. StraussIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Culver v. Judge of the Superior CourtMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Le Fevre v. MatthewsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  5. M. P. Moller, Inc. v. FarleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API