Rose v. . R. G. Franklin

Appellant presents this question as determinative of this appeal: Did the court below err in holding as a matter of law that the description of the land in the deeds under which plaintiffs claim extends to the middle or thread of the Tadkin River?

With that ruling we are in accord.

Defendant, having admitted that the plaintiffs have a good and valid title to all the lands embraced within the boundaries described in those deeds, and the Tadkin River at the point in question being non-navigable as admitted by all parties, the question involves the construction of what is the boundary. This is a…