Legal Opinion

Coastal Hills Rural etc. v. Co. of Sonoma

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 31, 2016No. A145573Published

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 8/31/16 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE COASTAL HILLS RURAL PRESERVATION, Plaintiff and Appellant, A145573 v. (Sonoma County COUNTY OF SONOMA et al., Super. Ct. No. SCV255694) Defendants and Respondents; JACK PETRANKER et al., Real Paries In Interest. This action was brought under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)1 to challenge the proposed expansion of a Buddhist retreat center approved by defendant County of Sonoma (County). The County adopted a mitigated negative declaration (MND) in lieu…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Topanga Assn. for a Scenic Comm. v. CTY OF LOS ANGELESCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Hale v. MorganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Vineyard Area Citizens for Responsible Growth, Inc. v. City of Rancho CordovaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Cedars-Sinai Medical Center v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API