Legal Opinion
Stanley v. Onetta Boat Works, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 18, 1970No. 24903PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HALL, District Judge.
From an extremely complicated trial raising perplexing procedural and factual situations which required a 22 page opinion by the Trial Judge, Honorable John F. Kilkenny, two points are urged by appellant :
1. Did the appellant insurance company assume and negligently perform the inspection and repairing of the subject ship which went aground at launching before the purchaser, Stanley, accepted it from the boat works ?
2. Did the risk contract of insurance to the boat builder cover the purchaser’s loss of profits for the delay resulting from the grounding and the ship’s…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- I-L Logging Co. v. Manufacturers & Wholesalers Indemnity ExchangeOregon Supreme Court · 1954
- Lanasa Fruit Steamship & Importing Co. v. Universal InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
3Cited by5 opinions
- Krug v. MILLERS'MUTUAL INSURANCE ASS'NSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
- Bender Shipbuilding & Repair Company, Inc. v. C.N. Lloyd Brasileiro, the Hartford Insurance Company of Alabama, in PersonamCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- Mason v. National Flood Insurers AssociationDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1973
- SDS Lumber Co. v. Allendale Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1983
- William A. Stanley v. Onetta Boat Works, Inc., an Oregon Corporation, and Third Party v. Union Insurance Society of Canton, Ltd., a Hong Kong Corporation, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970