Legal Opinion

Mason v. National Flood Insurers Association

District Court, D. Hawaii

Decided July 13, 1973No. Civ. 71-3350PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

PENCE, Chief Judge.

Plaintiffs brought suit to require defendant National Flood Insurers Association 1 and defendant First Insurance Company of Hawaii, Ltd., a Hawaii corporation, to indemnify plaintiffs for the expenses which plaintiffs had incurred for repairs to the patio of their home. 2

Plaintiffs allege that the terms of the National Flood Insurance Act (Act) 3 and of their flood insurance policy cover the subject damages, since, they claim, the collapse of their patio resulted from a “direct loss by flood”, as those terms are defined in the Act and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Aschenbrenner v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. General Casualty Company of America, a Corporation v. Azteca Films, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
  3. Stanley v. Onetta Boat Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  4. American Casualty Company of Reading, Penn. v. Bert SimpsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. The Bull's Corner Restaurant, Inc. v. The Director of the Federal Emergency Management AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  2. Cross Queen, Inc. v. Director, Federal Emergency Management AgencyDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1980
  3. Avemco Insurance Company v. ChungDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1975
  4. Segal v. Great American Insurance Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1974
  5. Estate of Calibuso Ex Rel. Calibuso v. Pacific InsuranceHawaii Supreme Court · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API