Legal Opinion

State v. Luarks

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 30, 2015No. 106,643PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Nuss, C.J.:

Richard Luarks raises two challenges to the district court’s calculation of his criminal history score and his resulting 172-month prison sentence. He generally contends the court erred by over-classifying all three of his pre-Kansas Sentencing Guidelines Act (KSGA) convictions as person felonies. And he also argues the classification as a person felony of one of those convictions— for burglary—was unconstitutional because it was based on a fact that was never proven to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt.

Luarks’ arguments are controlled by our…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. State v. KeelSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  4. State v. DickeySupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  5. State v. CordellSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. SartinSupreme Court of Kansas · 2019
  2. State v. NguyenSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
  3. State v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2016
  4. State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2016
  5. State v. VasquezCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2016

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API