State v. Luarks
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Nuss, C.J.:
Richard Luarks raises two challenges to the district court’s calculation of his criminal history score and his resulting 172-month prison sentence. He generally contends the court erred by over-classifying all three of his pre-Kansas Sentencing Guidelines Act (KSGA) convictions as person felonies. And he also argues the classification as a person felony of one of those convictions— for burglary—was unconstitutional because it was based on a fact that was never proven to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt.
Luarks’ arguments are controlled by our…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- State v. KeelSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
- State v. DickeySupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
- State v. CordellSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. SartinSupreme Court of Kansas · 2019
- State v. NguyenSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
- State v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2016
- State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2016
- State v. VasquezCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2016
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.