State v. Martin
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Malone, C.J.:
Michael R. Martin appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence. Specifically, Martin argues that the district court erred when it classified his two 1990 Kansas juvenile adjudications for burglary as person felonies for criminal history purposes, resulting in an illegal sentence. Martin claims he is entitled to relief under our Kansas Supreme Courts holding in State v. Dickey, 301 Kan. 1018, 350 P.3d 1054 (2015). The State responds by arguing that the district court properly denied the motion to correct illegal sentence because Martins sentence…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- State v. GouldSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
- State v. KeelSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2018
- State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2016
- State v. GalesCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2019
- State v. VasquezCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2016
- State v. CrossmanCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.