Burleson v. United States
District Court, W.D. Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN W. OLIVER, District Judge.
Petitioner, slightly over a year after we denied his Section 2255 motion (see Burleson v. United States, W.D.Mo.1962, 205 F.Supp. 331 and 209 F.Supp. 464) has now filed a motion for leave to file a petition for writ of error coram nobis.
For the reasons fully stated in Burns v. United States, W.D.Mo.1962, 210 F. Supp. 528, at 530 to 532, we rule that we do not have jurisdiction to entertain such a petition. Consistent with the rule that “[a]n applicant for * * * relief ought not to be held to the niceties of lawyers’ pleadings” (Sanders v. United States, 373 U.S.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sanders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- MacHibroda v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Ernest Eugene Taylor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1956
- Burleson v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1962
- Burns v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1962
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Louis J. Burleson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
- Burleson v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1964