Legal Opinion

Burleson v. United States

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided May 24, 1962No. 13782PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN W. OLIVER, District Judge.

This is a Section 2255, Title 28 U.S.C.A. proceeding. 1 Leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted.

Petitioner’s application for habeas corpus and his invocation of F.R.Crim.P., Rule 35, 18 U.S.C.A., must be laid to one side. The motion procedure provided in Section 2255 must be exhausted before an application for habeas corpus may be entertained. The last paragraph of that section expressly so provides. Nor may Rule 35 be invoked under the majority opinion in Hill v. United States, 368 U.S. 424, 430, 82 S.Ct. 468, 7 L.Ed.2d 417 (1962). See also concurring…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. MacHibroda v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. United States v. HaymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. Walker v. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Robert Allen French v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  2. Application of BuccheriCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
  3. State v. HardyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Burleson v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1962
  5. Hamby v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1963

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API